It looks like Lee Harvey Oswald types are becoming legitimate political operatives. Conservative "entertainer" and all-round mouth-with-a-mike Hal Turner calls on all pre-postal xenophobes to make their lock-and-loads heard by Congress over immigrant amnesty:
"ANY MEMBER OF CONGRESS WHO INTRODUCES, CO-SPONSORS OR VOTES IN FAVOR OF ANY SUCH AMNESTY WILL BE DECLARED A DOMESTIC ENEMY AND WILL BE CONSIDERED A LEGITIMATE TARGET FOR ASSASSINATION,"
A legitimate target for assassination? I'm glad they are not going to shoot just any Congressman.* Otherwise, some people might think it is lawless.
(*Congressmen-- I know that this seems to be a breech of etiquette, but I go by the theory that a prefix before -man or -men neuters the word. Such as "hu-man," or "wo-man.")
Yes, it is just entertainment. A political comedy sketch by a political satirist. Hey Hal: I hear John Hinckley is available and wants work badly.
He recites the catch-22 of the anti-immigration movement:
"Members of Congress and the Senate will NOT be permitted to BETRAY our nation by simply GIVING AWAY the most cherished aspect of America, Citizenship, to millions of people who cared so little for what Citizenship means that they came here against our law," he continued.
If you want to be here so badly that you resist our laws than you should not be here because you do not care for our laws. This article is not about immigration, but in passing I will say that I cannot discuss the issue and not see the irony of it of which anti-immigration people seem totally unaware. Another irony here: he then suggests breaking laws by shooting members of Congress. Irony is back from the grave and sucking your blood, Hal.
Does this mean Bush becomes "wacking material" if he signs it into law? Bush is on record saying some warm and fuzzy things about immigrants:
"Latinos come to the US to seek the same dreams that have inspired millions of others: they want a better life for their children. Family values do not stop at the Rio Grande. Latinos enrich our country with faith in God, a strong ethic of work, community & responsibility. We can all learn from the strength, solidarity, & values of Latinos. Immigration is not a problem to be solved, it is the sign of a successful nation. New Americans are to be welcomed as neighbors and not to be feared as strangers."
--Bush Speech in Washington, D.C. Jun 26, 2000
It's enough to make a Nazi cross.
Like most conservatives, though, Turner believes "words mean things." This is Orwell quoted in doubleplus duckspeak. Here is an example of its use:
". . . [O]ne supporter wrote to Turner's website, 'Hey Hal instead of saying 'may' SAY you WILL KILL THEM!!!'"
"No no no no no. Words mean things, the difference between 'may' and 'will' is the difference between an opinion and a threat. . . . One is lawful, the other is not!"
Translating this out of duckspeak, Turner really said: "No, you idiot! Why don't you just reserve me a room at the Federal Penitentiary?"
This makes it one of the most legally correct incitements to violence ever. He is saying: "somebody misunderstand me and shoot them." Just this kind of leadership that has put radical conservatism into retreat. Leadership by the hindmost, the opportunistic, and the deceptive. People who will remind their followers that words mean things while tricking them with words.
The guy has free speech rights, and he should not be tried or put in jail. I beg law enforcement: do not make this pathetic phony into a martyr, at least not so cheaply. Besides the obvious reasons, radical conservatives should have a better leader.
Turner, is more than willing to import the illegal alien politics of Fatwa rather than illegal aliens. That cannot be less destructive to America. He is reading from Iraqi insurgent books. This is hardly entertainment.
From Saturday Night Live to Talk Radio
From the 1970s, which I call the years of disillusion, Americans have mainly been educated by comedians. If most of us knew anything about politics, it would be from Chevy Chase doing Gerald Ford, Dan Akroid doing Jimmy Carter, or Dana Carvey doing George Bush Sr.
Real politics re-entered our culture as entertainment by Rush Limbaugh. As a comedian, he would have bombed, as a political commentator, he would have relegated to "Letters to the Editor" but his success formula was an ad hoc hybrid of extremely rude and crude politics packaged as entertainment. The rude and crude politics replaced comedy. Media commercials had trained people for years to buy a product if its commercials made them laugh. Now they were ready to laugh even when it was not funny and then vote. It showed that many people in our culture could no longer tell the difference between comedy and politics.
This was Limbaugh's appeal, and it tapped into some people's seething frustration with the political system and their sense of helplessness about it, who needed something rude and crude to laugh about. They became ditto-heads first. Knowing nothing else about the issues, they repeated ditto-speak like jokes. When they laughed enough, they then rewarded it by going to the polls and "buying" the product: the politicians.
I will confess that I began to get interested in politics with Rush Limbaugh. I had been trained to see politics as comedy, but I myself was angry. It took about a year before I had enough of him. I spent a lot of time looking for somebody, anybody willing to argue against the views I heard. I found out what many ditto-heads did: people on the left did not argue it at the time, they simply ridiculed you. They had opinions, but were not mentally prepared then to argue them. Moreover, they had totally "dropped out." They thought politics to be beneath them. Rush's aggressive declarations held the field then
I myself began to pay attention to politics because of Rush. I was politically undereducated, and Rush made me start studying it. I know that there are probably others like me, and in that way, Limbaugh did a service. Once I began to study and think about it, I quickly rejected Limbaugh.
Other conservative "entertainers" followed Limbaugh's formula but pushed it further to extremes. They have now created a backlash which culminated in this last election. This was more than aggravated by this disastrous presidency and congress. The liberal constituency in the US after years of chaos and inactivity has been re-awakened. Stimulated by the internet, liberals are thinking and politically mobilized now.
Conservative ideology and politics are on the retreat. They might make a resurgence because this country's troubles are daunting now. We have probably missed the time to act on them. To cite the problems I see: we have huge, unmanageable deficits, we have an aging population, where those over 85 are the fastest growing demographic group, our education system is the shame of the industrialized world, same with our medical system, and we are up to our necks in Iraq.
Also, IMO, I think climate change is going to heavily disfavor the US.
Terrorism and immigration are ordinary problems by comparison. It is hard to imagine an attack or a gate-crashing on our borders being a worse disaster than Katrina. Never mind terrorism or immigration if we take one or two more hits like that.